Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Screen Trek - An Intersection of Movie Reviews, Articles, Essays and Conversation

WATCHMEN: PERHAPS DON'T WATCH THEM AFTER ALL

March 19th 2009 10:07
Watchmen: Malin Ackerman as the Silk Spectre
The Silk Spectre (Malin Ackerman) demonstrates her fire retardant bangs in Watchmen.

Reading the graphic novel of Watchmen is an intense experience. Frame after turbulent frame flows together and turning the page would sometimes leave the reader stuck for a good five minutes, just trying to absorb all of the information being flung at them by writer Alan Moore and illustrator Dave Gibbons. The tale of broken crime fighters and a Cold War about to explode quickly gathered a strong and dedicated fan base, one that seemed to explode once unleashed upon the fledgling internet of the late 90s. It is probably Moore’s greatest work (with the possible exception of V for Vendetta) and displayed a wealth of ideas generated by a man seemingly at the height of his creative powers.


A movie adaptation of this great work could only ever be a tricky prospect and over the past year fans of the book around the world have been putting hands to heads imagining all of terrible outcomes from such an enterprise. It came as a carefully greeted pleasant surprise then, when early reports had the film as being all that the dedicated could hope for, with many of the graphic novel’s frames being fastidiously translated directly to the silver screen. Unfortunately, while this is the case, director Zack Snyder has accidentally managed to torpedo his own ship, creating a film for fanboys, not cinemagoers.


For those who haven’t read the graphic novel, Watchmen is set in an alternative version of 1985. Ever since an American victory in the Vietnam War, the world has been moving slowly but surely towards certain nuclear conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. Richard Nixon is still in power and a large part of his remaining leverage over the Soviets is the seemingly omnipotent Dr. Manhattan (Billy Crudup), a man obliterated in a science experiment and subsequently reconstituted at a quantum level. Costumed superheroes are part of this alternative reality, but have long been made to hang up their masks thanks to the government sponsored Keene Act.

All that changes, however, with the murder of the Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan), a robust ex-hero whose death catches the attention of one of the country’s few active vigilantes, Rorschach (Jackie Earle Haley). Rorschach quickly concludes that The Comedian’s murder was due to his past life as a superhero and sets out to warn other former members of the Watchmen, including Dr. Manhattan, Nite Owl (Patrick Wilson), Ozymandias (Matthew Goode), and the Silk Spectre (Malin Akerman). The news leads the outlawed collective to get back in touch and some of them to eventually to get back in the game as The Comedian’s death seemingly sets of a chain reaction of events that could put them in and danger and push the world to the brink of nuclear war.

There are numerous problems with Watchmen, but everything starts with the way in which Snyder and his screenwriters, David Hayter and Alex Tse, have approached the work’s transition to screen. You have to admire the trio’s almost slavish dedication to the source material and you do get a kick every now and then out of seeing memorable frames brought to the screen, but a graphic novel is not a film; the two mediums are completely different. In trying to be as faithful as possible to the frames of the book, Snyder and company have left many of their chosen medium’s tools in the box. The result is a film that in its early scenes moves at a snail’s pace, as just about every one of Moore and Gibbon’s frames are lovingly recreated for the camera. And despite their toils on this first act, little character depth is created for the uninitiated audience members.

Patrick Wilson and Malin Ackerman in Watchmen.
Nite Owl (Patrick Wilson) and Silk Spectre (Malin Ackerman) get confused and deal out justice to some crims who are already locked up.

Part of the reason for this is the filmmakers’ incapacity to use one of Moore’s clever tricks from the graphic novel. At the end of each installment or chapter of Watchmen were multiple pages of extracts from newspaper articles, character’s biographies and the like that not only provided important back-story but also gave a lot of depth to the happenings in the book. With Snyder, Hayter and Tse’s approach to the translation there’s very little time for this background, despite a fabulous opening titles sequence that shows the modern history of the crime fighter and the late 1930s Minutemen being succeeded by the Watchmen. In fact, this opening is easily the highlight of the film and shows that when he wants to Snyder can tell a tale with clever economy.

Without the background it’s harder to invest in characters, a situation not helped by some subtle changes from the novel in terms of characterisation. Rorschach has been softened slightly and made less patently insane, which in turn makes his narration (lifted in a large part straight from the book) less the Chandler-esque mutterings of a madman and more just Chandler-lite. His character in the film earns little empathy, his meat cleaver attack on a paedophile no longer just unnecessary but completely alienating to the audience. Silk Spectre too has been given short thrift in the film, seemingly stripped of the spunk and quiet anger she carries in the novel, although things aren’t helped by a strangely toneless performance from Ackerman.

While things do pick up pace in the second half of Watchmen, by that stage things begin to lose their balance somewhat. The filmmakers start to cut more of the source material from the film, but strangely add in other brand new sequences, such as an ill-advised pastiche of Dr. Strangelove’s war room scenes where Robert Wisden as President Nixon honks some exposition through a Plasticine nose (so bad a make-up job that Snyder would have been better off sending a runner down to a local toy store to grab a Tricky Dick party mask).

Jeffrey Dean Morgan in Watchmen
Jeffrey Dean Morgan impresses as the Comedian in Watchmen.

Under all of this mess there are a few positive notes. Watchmen does indeed look like a million bucks and the casting is almost spot-on, despite Ackerman’s poor acting and the fact that the genuinely frightening Jackie Earle Hayley seems a foot too short to play Rorschach. Jeffrey Dean Morgan is particularly impressive as the physically intimidating Comedian, and it’s a shame (but not surprising) that the adaptation couldn’t give him more screen time.

At the end of the day, Snyder and his team have simply taken the wrong route with Watchmen. It’s like they were given the parts to a car and told to rebuild it, but without the necessary instructions simply made sure it looked exactly like the brochure, forgetting about the mechanics underneath. It’s an unenviable job trying to satisfy the fanboys and also the average cinemagoer, but the makers of Watchmen have seemed to avoid all of the hard decisions with their adaptation. Scared to break down the work and recreate it into a compelling cinematic experience, they’ve instead made a wax model of Moore and Gibbon’s book; it might look like the real thing, but ultimately there’s nobody really there.

Check out the trailer to Watchmen below:







77
Vote


   

   

   


Comments
11 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Damo

March 19th 2009 11:51
Slow beginnings are the dread of any movie watcher.

I hope this worth the effort.

I found 300 unimpressive and V just plain silly.

Comment by Matt Shea

March 19th 2009 14:05
Hey Damo. Thanks for the comment. Yeah, 300 gave me the sh*ts, to be honest. This is certainly a little better than that, but it does move terribly slowly for the first half. I'm a longtime fan of V the book and I thought the movie wasn't too bad, but it also suffered from being a bit sluggish.

Comment by Damo

March 20th 2009 02:11
I was watching V and enjoying it up until he tried to explain why he tortured the girl for her own good.

"Thank you Mr V," was her attitude.

Instead she should kicked him in the goolies and run like hell from this fanatic.

Comment by Matt Shea

March 20th 2009 02:18
Ha - you're absolutely right, that doesn't work in the film. In the graphic novel it works because they get a lot more time to set that stuff up.

Comment by David O'Connell

March 20th 2009 03:31
Good stuff Matt, you're certainly coming at this from a different angle being so intimately familiar with the graphic novel. I'm seeing this on the weekend - but I'm going in cold, without any knowledge of the source material at all!

Comment by Matt Shea

March 20th 2009 03:45
Dave, thanks for the comments. I'll be really interested to read what you think, because I noticed that the people who hadn't read the graphic novel tended to dislike the film even more than I did.

Comment by David O'Connell

March 23rd 2009 09:22
I saw this yesterday Matt and have to confess to being a little disappointed by it.
Without doubt I'll be reading the graphic novel some time down the track before attacking the film again.

The opening titles are extraordinary - very exciting and so meticulously put together, and there are some excellent moments scattered throughout, but somehow it just didn't hang together for me, not in any consistantly compelling way. It just never blew me out of my seat the way I imagined - or just hoped - I would be.

Comment by Matt Shea

March 23rd 2009 09:27
Hey Dave - thanks for the comment. Like I said, I was really interested to read your thoughts on it. That's the thing, though - Snyder and co try to recreate the graphic novel on screen as accurately as possible and just can't do it. Ultimately it adds nothing new so there has never been a truer utterance of, 'Just read the book.'

Comment by Cibbuano

March 25th 2009 20:01
After watching it, I remember shrugging and thinking "Well, that's probably the best you could get away with"...

the only way to make a critically successful comic book film would be to eschew the box office and make a unique film that's only influenced by the source material. "Watchmen" needed its own life on film, instead of replicating the graphic novel...

Comment by Matt Shea

March 26th 2009 02:10
Exactly Cib. You have to forget about the fanboys and the box office, strip the story down to its barest of elements and build it for the screen from there.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
2 Posts
10 Posts
121 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Mountain Fog
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]